Eleven Presidents to Choose From and Billy's Best Chum Was Nixon

By John Bloom | 11/07/2007


The Preacher and the Presidents:
Billy Graham in the White House
by Nancy Gibbs and Michael Duffy. Center Street, 413 pp., $26.99. Publication date: August 2007.

If you set out to write the first book about Billy Graham that doesn't have God in it, this much-ballyhooed tome by two Time Magazine reporters would be just about as close as you could come. It's not really a biography. There have been dozens of those. Gibbs and Duffy take the eternal God-Caesar partnership and try to strip it of theology, positioning the evangelist as part power broker, part courtier, part apologist for the mighty, in an attempt to see if he had any influence on secular history. This framing of his life in the context of various presidential adminitrations—he's known every U.S. chief executive since Truman—gives the book the feel of high-minded gossip. We hear all about the little notes exchanged between Graham and the presidents, as he suggests public prayers and private Bible readings, as he pastors powerful men in times of weakness, as he learns to work the press to his own advantage as well as theirs, and as he eventually settles on a more or less consistent policy of favoring moderate Republican positions while technically remaining above the political fray. What we don't get is any kind of "gotcha" moment, when Graham doubts his own calling or the president doubts his own faith. The overall effect is soothing both to the republic and to deists everywhere.

The authors are clearly taken with the man. They start off by describing their ascent to the inner sanctum in Montreat, North Carolina, then assessing his life as "like no other" because he "is believed to have spoken face-to-face with more people in more places than anyone in history, having preached the gospel to 210 million people in 185 countries in 417 crusades over the course of more than half a century." We won't hear about any of those crusades, though, unless a president is present, and so they dodge what would seem to be the essential question here: How do you simultaneously serve Caesar and God?

They touch on the issue several times. During the Eisenhower years, the fight against Communism seems to become the essence of his gospel. Graham continues to publicly vouch for the integrity of Richard Nixon until very late in the Watergate crisis. He opposes Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson during the Monica Lewinsky affair by advocating forgiveness—the same position he takes privately in counseling sessions with Hillary Clinton. His one and only official visit to see President Truman results in a tawdry little series of self-promotions with the press corps that cause Truman to think of Graham forever after as a fraud. Then shortly after the election of John Kennedy, the roles are reversed: Kennedy advisor Theodore Sorensen is fairly cynical in the way he sets up a photo op with Graham that essentially makes "the Catholic issue" go away. A lot of Graham's interactions with the presidents seem to take place on golf courses, further cementing his image as a frustrated politician (there's some evidence that he briefly considered a run at the presidency in the fifties—his wife Ruth squelched the idea) who somehow ended up as a rock-star preacher instead.

But the moment we're waiting for—Billy Graham's own dark night of the soul—never materializes. You would think after Watergate he would have some serious doubts about his chosen path of minister to the powerful. By his own admission he was closer to Richard Nixon than to any other president, and yet he professes to be completely blindsided by what turns out to be the man's moral dodginess. The most he can admit is that he was never entirely certain about the sincerity of Nixon's faith. And even after that, he continues to write letters and speeches that are almost parodies of "Christian Nation" hyperbole, believing that each successive president is facing "the most difficult challenges in our history" but believing that each one "will be remembered as one of the greatest leaders in history," all while maintaining an understated but obvious belief in the United States as the leader of the Christian world. (He may have evangelized all over Africa and Latin America, but he has never become one of those southern-hemisphere World Council of Churches guys. In fact, his theological language has remained squarely in the 19th century. He uses the same words and phrases that were used by Dwight Moody or, for that matter, Lyman Beecher, last of the New England Congregationalists. Although a Southern Baptist himself, he never made much of a connection with the nation's most famous Southern Baptist president, Jimmy Carter. Bill Clinton was so active in the Baptist church that as a boy he helped organize a Graham crusade in Arkansas, but Graham seems to identify more with the distaff Clinton, a Tillich-influenced Methodist.)

Billy Graham was never an intellectual, and in fact he made a conscious decision to ignore the whole course of 20th-century Biblical scholarship. He probably never once in his life quoted Karl Barth. The authors try to explain this decision (not very successfully) in terms of his need for a simple faith, but I don't really see how turning off your mind has anything to do with having a simple faith. At any rate, his embracing of a vanished old-fashioned Christendom, beginning very early in his ministry, is what made it possible, I think, for him to speak to so many people in so many countries without getting entangled by something as sticky as doctrinal ambiguity. That has an enormous appeal for the unlettered, and, as it turns out, it has an enormous appeal for politicians.

When you look through the photo section of the book, what you're struck by is the athletic vigor and public vitality of all the official photos. Billy Graham's life has been spent mostly among the well-heeled and the privileged, and of course there's nothing wrong with that—they need pastors, too. And given the hype surrounding this book, that's what he'll be remembered for. Graham knows better than most of us that that's not what God cares about, though. Even a Dwight Moody 19th-century theology knows that all things pass away, including the American republic. Would that the authors had shown the same understanding.


Comments(20)

anonymous | 11:59 am on 11/08/2007

My opinion of this magazine is thoroughly disgusting.
I can't even believe as believers you would put out such garbage like this - however, due to your pride and arrogance you, just like these other people you are trying to destroy - are doing this for the Lord.
Good one!

"vengeance is mine saith the Lord"

This is NOT your job to take down ministries.

Look at the plank in your own eye.

If your commune was so abundant in Judeo Christian teaching - then why arn't people flocking to your doors?????
I live in Dallas - I know all about you.

I am a believer, but would NEVER believe in garbage such as your Trinity Foundation and this ridiculous magazine!

God help you.

Eric | 02:55 pm on 11/10/2007

Why is it that the internet allows people to say things with anonymity? If you're willing to say something on the net...then sign your name.

Or...

Are you afraid???

Pot...meet kettle!

Or...

In the words of Paul Aldrich...

"Loooggg Eyeeee...."

Eric

holeinpocket | 12:26 pm on 11/11/2007

"On the Internet, no one knows you're a dog"

And dog is God spelled backwards, with a lower case d. So there.

JT | 02:08 am on 12/13/2007

You're right "anonymous," your opinion of this magazine IS thoroughly disgusting.

Janie Poppell | 03:11 pm on 11/08/2007

Well I for one believe in your magazine--it's right here on my desk. And as far as the unbiased review above, good job. I intend on checking the Graham tome out of the library soon but not today. I seem to have a plank in my eye. :o)

Gail | 05:27 pm on 11/08/2007

Why do they all live in Dallas?

I need to relocate.

Anonymous | 10:11 pm on 11/08/2007

T ry Austin. There are't quite so many there.........

Thief | 03:07 pm on 11/11/2007

T ry Austin. There are't quite so many there.........

Nope... just politicians and lobbyists.

bill proud | 06:46 pm on 11/08/2007

In the 6th chapter of Judges Gideon is called upon to serve God. The first thing God has Gideon do is tear down the altar of baal. The altar of baal is represented by anything we worship beyond God and Jesus Christ, including money, false religion and false pastors.

When the men of the city arose in the morning and found the altar of baal destroyed they wanted to kill Gideon. They didn't want to repent from their sin, they wanted their own self-righteous justice. Gideon was sent to bring a message of repentance and deliverance, and they wanted to kill the messenger. "Bring out your son that he may die," they said. Can you see the venom in these words?

Joash spoke up on behalf of Gideon and said, "Would you plead for baal? Would you save him? Let baal plead against him if he is a god."

I tell you this is a time for mourning and sadness on what is occurring in this country today. We need to search the scriptures and know the Word until we are all Bible scholars.

Even the very elect will be deceived in the coming days. Beloved, if you claim Jesus Christ, awake.

Glory to God!

Anonymous | 02:26 pm on 1/30/2008

You said: "We need to search the scriptures and know the Word until we are all Bible scholars."

Could you recommend a good study guide for that? Perhaps you could write one? And include it as a "free gift" for a $100 donation?

(...running away and ducking, hiding behind a rock).

But seriously isn't this always the TRAP. People always want a short-cut to God, a short-cut to understanding scriptures. And whether the answer is a Catholic Priest who gives you "readings" at a "mass" gathering -- or a "Catechism" -- or the modern "audio-tape & study guide" -- it's the SAME trap. And just as it has always proceeded from a good intent by the initial "reformers" it has also always ended up being used as a profitable one by the shysters and frauds.

The only difference nowadays is that the transition from one to the other happens faster, and much more often in the same personage (it used to take 2 or even 3 generations).

Anonymous | 02:24 am on 11/09/2007

I applaud you. I don't believe that Billy Graham is in the same fold as the televangelist. The televangelist are a special group of people, they never tell you anything that could cause any form of christian or spiritual growth. They are constantly preforming signs and wonders, casting out demons and prophesying. God tells them about the little old lady in South Dakota that just got healed from cancer, but He doesn't tell them her name. This can be very confusing if there is more than one little old lady with cancer in South Dakota watching. Since the Lord just healed this person and told the televangelist about it, He should at least tell them her name don't you think. If I were a televangelist, everyday I would read Matthew 7:21-23 and I would ask myself, "Gee, who does this sound like?"

Joe-Allen Doty | 09:08 pm on 11/10/2007

I see that John Bloom, aka Joe Bob Briggs, has more or less hijacked the "Wittenburg Door" website and he has a rather filthy imagination.

When it comes to having a proper education on knowing how to properly interpret Scripture, using the principles of Biblical Hermeneutics, he is quite ignorant.

He has moved the Door from being the best Christian Satire magazine to something worse than Mad Magazine humor.

Lee Veal | 01:47 am on 11/12/2007

Billy Graham was by some accounts the best Fuller Brush salesman in North Carolina. The Fuller Brush sales force peddled their wares door to door. The keys to making a sale and even more so to become the 'best'
- one has to stay on point,
- don't be confused by facts and evidence that run counter to the product you're peddling,
- and above all never accept 'no' for an answer.

It worked for him when he was peddling brushes. It's continued to work for him as peddles his brand of Christianity.

The products change, but the techniques stay the same.
Once a salesman, always a salesman, I guess.

Lee

Anonymous | 10:31 am on 11/12/2007

E-Sword.net

Phillyguy | 09:09 am on 11/15/2007

Great article, Graham is a Fraud, kingdom builder, eccumenticle and worshiped by the unregenerate clergy. His crusades are staged performances and the media drives his "image".

writer bob | 03:35 pm on 11/20/2007

Billy Graham had his mission and he fulfilled it well. Unfortunately, we needed Bonhoeffer and got Graham. He had the eye of the world and the ear of presidents but he did not talk about the poor, the homeless, the sick, those without social justice. Jesus said that was the role of godly nations and our Constitution requires it... "establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty..."

Teddy Bear Mohammed | 04:59 pm on 12/12/2007

Billy Grahan is a little like Jesse Jackson. He loves to be on television and around powerful people. Whenever a president is in moral trouble, Billy pimps himself as their spirital advisor.

rick | 01:31 am on 1/16/2008

Fruit, my friend. Look at the fruit. Look at his marriage. His children's lives and testimonies. The length and breadth of his ministry. His message... I know that anyone who heard the gospel from his lips learned that we are lost sinners and Jesus died for us and rose again because our creator God loves us and he's coming again to take us home to his eternal kingdom. The fruit of this man's life and ministry is a staggering, eternal abundance which honors and glorifies God.

Biblical Scholar | 12:45 am on 1/29/2008

Was it unwise to make a conscious decision to trust the Bible as the reliable Word of God?

What are the fruits of Western Biblical scholarship in the 20th-century?

Genevieve | 11:03 pm on 5/02/2011

Good to see a tleant at work. I can’t match that.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.