American Fundamentalists: Their Identification, Traits, and Proper Mockery

03/05/2008


By Jeff Gustafson

Contrary to media representation, North American evangelicalism is by no means the reflection of a single monolithic mentality. As the icy clutch of diversity continues to wring dry the neck of the once predictably Bible-thumpin’, gay-bashin’, infomercial givin’ hegemony of the evangelical church, it has been forced to accommodate a number of lifestyles and cultures, none of which are particularly interesting. Still, spotting them in the wild can be a dicey business. Here is each, according to their kind.

OLD-SCHOOL FUNDIES

Fundies

Identification: As the name implies, this is the class of evangelical that has changed the least since America’s founding. They are mostly relegated to the South, but with healthy distributions in the Midwest and Appalachian regions, always in secluded areas. They are distinguished from other groups mainly by their primitiveness and their tendency to spit a lot while preaching. Forget televangelist sheen; these guys are the genuine article, and as such are often disheveled and unwashed. (Fig 1.1) They tend to have large, bulbous eyes, particularly when they’re describing something from Revelation. Don’t be surprised if they’ve got a couple snakes hanging on them. Oh, and guns. Lots of ‘em.

Beliefs: Imagine the most seriously out-to-lunch ramblings of Pat Robertson, or that guy who has that half-hour show on the end times on UPN, and multiply it by ten. The ones that can read disagree with the theology of the Left Behind series, but only because it isn’t wacky enough. James Dobson’s claim that SpongeBob Squarepants supports the homosexual agenda is insufficient—they cannot fathom a popular children’s character who doesn’t support homosexuals, although their knowledge of cartoons is strictly limited to hearsay, as none of them own TVs. In terms of the Bible, they tend towards the sections that have God doing awesomely violent things while including the Jesus stuff more or less as a concession. If you suggest that perhaps the gospel accounts of Jesus don’t always give an entirely historical portrait, they’ll probably set you on fire.

Evangelical Style: Turn or burn. Old-school fundies tend to be direct, and prefer to tell you that you’re going to hell to your face rather than through the filter of TV or radio (neither of which they know how to operate). They can be seen on college campuses or metropolitan areas making a dramatic case for the Lord’s judgment, frequently using a homemade pedestal. This strikes people as cute and, in a hilarious misunderstanding of the intent, they will often leave spare change.

Political Views: Politics are too much of an “of this world” thing for the old-school fundie, so there is not much light to be shed in this section. Even Christian “hot-button” issues like abortion and gay marriage don’t sway them (aside from the occasional clinic bomber), since their extreme zealotry leads them to believe that even Bush is a rabid sodomite. A unique quality of old-school fundies that could be construed as “progressive” is the fact that they are about as likely to be black as white (KKK not included).

Musical Taste: You can never go wrong with old hymns, but I would submit that more of them are into death metal than is commonly thought.

How to Tame an Old-School Fundie: Tell him that your favorite part of Revelation is when the flying scorpions come to eat away at the unbelievers. Be prepared for him to recite the rest of Revelation by memory. Make sure there are no snakes on him before you make bodily contact. If social niceties are out of the question, just shoot him before he shoots you.

MAINSTREAM FUNDIES

This class of evangelical is the kind which the media portrays most accurately, which is fitting, since they are the most media-savvy. They have much in common with their cousin the Old-School Fundie, but they are far better dressed, are perhaps not quite so vitriolic in their preaching, and have heard of the Internet. They can be found anywhere, but spotting them in the wild is greatly simplified if you happen to know where the homosexual agenda will hit next (Fig. 1.2); they await its strike like a reactionary mongoose on its guard against a hypnotically amoral cobra. The main point of divergence between old-school and mainstream fundies is in appearance. They tend to favor the televangelist look for the men, conservative dresses for the women. They don’t carry around guns, but they have their Bible, and they will fire with a rifleman’s zeal.

MAINSTREAM FUNDIES

Beliefs: The Bible is the infallible word of God. Every species of evangelical will have some kind of statement to this effect, but they all have to gay it up with their appeals to cultural context, proper hermeneutical method, and the lexical-syntactical method, whatever that is. They are the truest, bluest form of Biblical literalists, though they probably won’t set you on fire, unless you ask them to. They are comfortable with a Left Behind level of nuttiness in interpreting the end times, and they are the only known evangelical species to admit to enjoying the Book of Leviticus. They’re way more into Jesus than their more primitive brethren, often pronouncing his name in three syllables (“Juh-EEZ-suss!”) to fully express their piety. Christ is the savior of the world, but He gives preferential treatment to Americans—specifically, American Christians—so that they will not have to be challenged with multiculturalism or slight lifestyle changes (“persecution”) in the pursuit of ultimate comfort … er, holiness.

Evangelical Style: Despite their uncanny ability to embarrass themselves, mainstream fundies maintain an imaginary public dignity that disallows them from embracing the Turn-or-Burn approach directly. They prefer catchy mantras like “The Condom Nation will receive Condemnation,” or “Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve,” or “Keep your laws off my body”1, and they have been known to make subtle hints that God will bring natural disaster on schools that vote against teaching intelligent design. They tend to at least generate a conversational tone before they start preaching at you, and they appeal just as much to God’s love for you as to His unquenchable wrath.
     Since so much of their ministry revolves around politics, getting you to vote for whoever they support on the tracts they send you is seen as akin to saving your soul. Still, winning you over for Christ is their ultimate goal, and they’ll be the first to tell you that it would break their heart to see you with the mark of the Beast on your forehead when the Judgment comes.

Political Views: This is the group that spawned the Moral Majority and Christian Coalition. They’re sane enough to fit into the normal political spectrum, but only just. They don’t “hate” gays, but they DO think that the gays have a vampiric lust to feed on the lifeblood of our children’s moral groundings. What’s more, most of them read and agree with Ann Coulter, even those who don’t still think she’s “on the right track.” Their contempt for public schools is second only to those who attend public schools. Most mainstream fundies homeschool their kids, all the while fighting for the inalienable rights of prayer, Bible indoctrination, and the stoning of adulterous teachers within the secularized walls of the Damned.
     Back in their heyday (which may still be now, for all anyone knows or cares), the Christian Coalition would send out flyers to their perceived constituencies that detailed the positions that various candidates held on key issues. Did they sanction the killing of children? Were they capable of spinning any left-leaning rhetoric of their opponent as anti-Christian? And most importantly, were they possessed by Satan? All these and more were given carefully thought-out answers by God’s chosen people, that whosoever should believe in them uncritically should not perish, but have everlasting voting power (Gospel of Pat Robertson, verse 16).

Musical Taste: For this part, it’s easier to go by what they disapprove of. They hate anything on secular radio, including Radio Disney, since we all know whose agenda Disney supports. They have been known to flog their children for watching MTV (one of the few things that qualifies them as decent parents), and even that stuff on the local Christian station is getting a bit too edgy, what with the electric guitar and all.

How to Tame a Mainstream Fundie: Tell them to shut up. Their indignation at this will manifest itself in an involuntary geyser of half-baked rhetoric about how the persecution of Christians is what’s sending America into the abyss and the separation of church and state is just a secular myth and so forth. I guess you can’t really “tame” a mainstream fundie, you can just get them to ramble incessantly, which will at best put them in a sort of trance. Our best field naturalists are still working on this one.


1The notion that this originated with pro-choice feminists is false. It was principally a mantra used by public-school attending children of mainstream fundies, whose parents’ zeal for seeing the 10 commandments displayed in the public arena was made manifest by the branding of 1-10 of the commandments on their children’s backs. This would mark the first—and last—time that feminists would ever borrow a slogan from evangelically parented schoolchildren.


Comments(56)

Anonymous | 09:11 am on 3/06/2008

A few Trinity Foundation traits in need of mockery:

• Zealous commitment to a domineering leader not accountable to any authority.

• Discouragement or punishment of dissent and doubt.

• Use of mind-altering techniques such as denunciation sessions--the infamous hot seats.

• Dictation by leadership of how followers should act, sometimes in great detail.

• Breakdown of personal boundaries, such as denying members permission to marry.

• Encouraging a sense of elitism or special status for the group.

• Fostering an "us vs. them" mentality.

Anonymous | 09:34 am on 3/06/2008

All true, except for the satire there would be little redeeming qualities of this rag. Anthonys' blotted view of himself, and his theology would not be any reason to read this publication. Except for the expose of the rediculous money changlings on TV, ( which most studied believers already know about ) I can't say they have accomplished anything of substance... except satire, which I love.

Process Deist | 09:59 am on 3/06/2008

My God....they have hacked into this website and now we are exposed.

The Doorkeeper | 03:55 pm on 3/08/2008

These are the same tired comments made by Doug and Wendy Duncan in book, website, interviews, etc., but mostly IN OUR COMMENTS FIELDS. Don't you have anything better to do with your time? Do you have to say the same thing a hundred times and fill up our Comments fields with it? If you want to criticize the Trinity Foundation or Ole Anthony, they have a website! For that matter, YOU have a website! Aren't there websites specifically devoted to "Hey, guys, this is a cult! Look out!" kinds of ministries? Go there! You've made your point. Everyone has heard you. Everyone is tired of you. Your anonymous postings have become the equivalent of spam. You're wasting our time. We're all about comedy here, not your grim carping.

dorsey | 07:26 am on 3/12/2008

“Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody's face but their own.”
--Jonathan Swift

I have been a fan of The Door since I entered college in 1981. I seem to remember, in those days, content didn't seem to be so angry, nor the sarcasm so acid. These days, while there's some genuinely funny stuff, the humor seems always threatened by a sense of bitterness.

To that I can only exhort, Ole, if you would ease up on the righteous anger and make fun of yourself (and stop pouting and/or lashing out when other people do), I think the magazine could once again be a force for good. And you could stop crying about money all the time.

I do love you guys.

wwYACd?

SRebbe | 10:20 am on 3/12/2008

thought this was rather spot on. I also grew up exposed to a plethora of denominations.

that calvinist doug | 09:48 am on 3/06/2008

Jeffrey, Jeffrey, Jeffrey...it should be the more patrician "Geoffrey"

While much of what you say is true, and some of it even managed to be a little bit funny, your tenor betrays your bias. It's ironic to see so plainly the selective venom you spew, and yet you seem either oblivious to it yourself, or uncaring. See the last two points of Anonymous above.

I hope, in the interest of full disclosure, there is a forthcoming article (or, at least, the recognition on your part that a similar article could be written pointing out the hypocrisy and downright lunacy of the progressive, modern Christian left). My impression is that The Door exists to poke fun of the poke-fun-worthy in all of Christendom, but the plethora of articles such as this would seem to indicate that only those on the (as is so often charicatured) "fundy" side are deserving of such treatment. Brother, let me point out that I am anything but a fundy, so this is not coming from a self-defensive reaction. It's just that it may be helpful to remember to seek for my own log before reaching for your speck.

Process Deist | 10:27 am on 3/06/2008

Fundies do not write humor about deists because they are too busy telling us we are going to hell.
I would never tell a fundie they were going to hell and damnation.

that calvinist doug | 02:04 pm on 3/06/2008

Dude, I was not aware that deists believed in heaven or hell. If the watchmaker wound us up and let us go and now doesn't pay any attention, an afterlife makes no sense.

Process Deist | 10:55 pm on 3/07/2008

That's why I don't tell anyone they are going to hell.
I do not believe God destroys....only creates.
The Kingdom of God is here and now.

that calvinist doug | 09:25 am on 3/08/2008

Seriously? That's it? In all candor, if I believed that, I'd be a raging epicurean (in the hedonistic sense). I mean, why does it matter to me what the consequences of my actions are if there is no accountability? Sure, I'll love my loved ones (Jesus taught us that even heathens do that) but otherwise, why should I care about you or the orphan or the widow, etc?

Also, you stated that you believe God only creates and does not destroy. See if my logic here makes any sense or if I'm just wacky...if God holds the creative power of life like you say, and he does not make that life eternal (i.e., you die, that's it), how is it that God does not destroy? If he can prevent your death, but doesn't, isn't that just semantics?

Process Deist | 11:40 am on 3/08/2008

I care about others because I believe we should love goodness and mercy and love God with all of our being.
People give life on earth meaning. (not purpose)
God dwells in us and we dwell within God...forever. God does not destroy part of God.

that calvinist doug | 11:50 am on 3/08/2008

That's fine if you believe that, but then you are actually a pantheist, not a deist.

I hope that distinction doesn't make me an uptight anal retentive.

Process Deist | 11:58 am on 3/08/2008

Perhaps you are right.
I somehow modify my deism with process theology.
If I started a church....I would probably be the only one there.
I started out life as a fundie....then moved on.

that calvinist doug | 12:02 pm on 3/08/2008

At least you won't have to deal with one of those ugly church splits!

Process Deist | 01:15 pm on 3/08/2008

HA! I remember the time the Fist Baptist split.
The First Methodist then moved down to 3rd largest church in town.
Also...is it possible for me to claim panentheist along with process deist?

that calvinist doug | 02:55 pm on 3/08/2008

The beauty of being a pantheist is that you can claim whatever you want. Who's gonna correct you? If you indeed meant to type panENtheist, frankly, I've never understood the difference. Seems like putting lipstick on the same old pig and calling it my prom date.

I'm just stuck in this reformed, sola scriptura worldview, so my options are more limited. But it works for me. I'm such a flippin' calvinist...

Process Deist | 04:47 pm on 3/08/2008

Well it is almost sprintime.
So, let your TULIP bloom. (couldn't resist a little Calvin Humor)
Two of my G-grandfathers were Cumberland Presby preachers.
And....yes I did mean panENtheist.....I mean is God in us and are we also in him....universe and all? Well...yes, I think so.
Wow...if I am wrong....I may only have grace to save my sorry hide.

that calvinist doug | 01:21 pm on 3/10/2008

Irresistible grace, to be exact!

Process Deist | 04:57 pm on 3/10/2008

Hey...the watchmaker thing.
He is still building the watch.
God never stopped creating.
On the Eighth Day....God rolled out
of bed and put on the work clothes.

David Williams | 08:21 am on 3/12/2008

Wow. This thread just keeps gettin' smaller and smaller. Seriously, though, progressive Christians need to get themselves a more vigorous theology of hell. You can sing kumbaya all you want, and blabber on all day about social justice, but when you back that with a theology that proclaims our Maker is little more than a passive enabler, you're just blowin' smoke.

Find the union of God's Love and God's Wrath, and you've got yourself a theology worth having. Take a looky-loo here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yincrVaTi1g

Dr. Mike | 12:05 pm on 3/12/2008

There is a far more serious issue at stake here, and I'm amazed that none of your fine and trenchant comments address it, namely the correct Mainstream Fundies' pronunciation for Jesus. It's actually not “Juh-EEZ-suss!” but the far more irritating "JAY-ah-Zussssssssss" with a protracted sibillance that dies out at the end of the name. Hinn does a really fine job of lingering on those final serpentine esses.

Process Deist | 04:26 pm on 3/12/2008

That's funny.
Good Bull

Process Deist | 05:31 pm on 3/12/2008

Thanks...I enjoyed your thoughts.
I can not agree in full with your lesson.
But it is well thought out and places us
firmly in God's love.
Thank God for youtube.

Robert Winkler Burke | 11:42 am on 3/06/2008

DISNEY’S THE KID: Movie Dialogue

Rusty: Ross?

Ross: Yeah kid?

Rusty: I get what you do now, I mean I get what I do. When I grow up – for a living. I figured out how to explain.

Ross: Let me hear it.

Rusty: You help people lie about who they really are, so that they can pretend to be someone else. Right?

Ross: Yeah.

Rusty: See? It’s not hard to explain.

BJ | 12:14 pm on 3/06/2008

Sir Bedevere: There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
Peasant 1: Are there? Oh well, tell us.
Sir Bedevere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
Peasant 1: Burn them.
Sir Bedevere: And what do you burn, apart from witches?
Peasant 1: More witches.
Peasant 2: Wood.
Sir Bedevere: Good. Now, why do witches burn?
Peasant 3: ...because they're made of... wood?
Sir Bedevere: Good. So how do you tell whether she is made of wood?
Peasant 1: Build a bridge out of her.
Sir Bedevere: But can you not also build bridges out of stone?
Peasant 1: Oh yeah.
Sir Bedevere: Does wood sink in water?
Peasant 1: No, no, it floats!... It floats! Throw her into the pond!
Sir Bedevere: No, no. What else floats in water?
Peasant 1: Bread.
Peasant 2: Apples.
Peasant 3: Very small rocks.
Peasant 1: Cider.
Peasant 2: Gravy.
Peasant 3: Cherries.
Peasant 1: Mud.
Peasant 2: Churches.
Peasant 3: Lead! Lead!
King Arthur: A Duck.
Sir Bedevere: ...Exactly. So, logically...
Peasant 1: If she weighed the same as a duck... she's made of wood.
Sir Bedevere: And therefore...
Peasant 2: ...A witch!

that calvinist doug | 02:07 pm on 3/06/2008

Pefectly logical. The matter is settled.

Anonymous | 09:53 am on 3/09/2008

NEE !!!!!
Who does the Moose effects for BJ?

BJ | 06:59 am on 3/10/2008

Knight 1: We are now no longer the Knights who say Ni.
Knight 2: NI.
Other Knights: Shh...
Knight 1: We are now the Knights who say...”Ekki-Ekki-Ekki-Ekki-PTANG. Zoom-Boing. Z'nourrwringmm.

Cynth | 08:11 pm on 4/11/2008

Ni!

TheDonQuixotic | 12:55 pm on 3/06/2008

Good idea but this isn't well developed enough? If its satire, make fun of everyone! This is far to selective in its approach to really be satire. It should also include other pieces of evangelical thought like:
Hippie Christian--- weakness to theology, loves accoustic guitar and starbucks
Liberal Christian--- loves religion while disliking the Old Testament ALOT
Rich Ceo Christian--- Makes money. Sometimes he donates to televangelist. Found cheating on spouse with gay lover.

I mean come one, you really dropped the ball. There is sooo much more that could have been made fun of.

Last word: DARN YOU PHELPS!!!

mountainguy | 10:57 pm on 3/06/2008

you're right. Though I move towards neoanabaptism (with some of antiyankee stuff because of my colombian nationality), it would be a lot fun to see satirical criticism about christian liberals, christian left, emerging churches, etc etc.

BJ | 02:07 pm on 3/06/2008

What's up with the picture of Bro. Phelps? I happen to know that figs are God's chosen fruit.

that calvinist doug | 02:11 pm on 3/06/2008

They were irresistibly drawn.

BJ | 02:14 pm on 3/06/2008

Unconditionally dried.

that calvinist doug | 02:54 pm on 3/06/2008

Totally delicious.

dorsey | 07:57 am on 3/12/2008

... in Limited supply.

dorsey | 01:53 pm on 3/12/2008

Um... I got nothing for perseverance.

Once a fig, always a fig?

that calvinist doug | 02:30 pm on 3/12/2008

Preserved!

dorsey | 08:47 pm on 3/15/2008

Bingo!
hahaha

BJ | 02:38 pm on 3/06/2008

This descrimination against figs has got to stop. This is America for God's sake. There is a place for all fruits. I know when you first look at the fig it looks like a nut. Just one touch and you will find it's skin to be thin and tender. I know what many say, the figs originated in this country in California and what good can come from California? Who can you blame for the spread of the figs? It's a fact the primary source of their pollenation is the WASP.

that calvinist doug | 02:51 pm on 3/06/2008

The figs have been getting slammed. They should form a policital action committee. Something like, Figs Against Getting Slammed. Now some may note that the acronymn for this group is FAGS, but I assure you that was unintentional.

BJ | 03:17 pm on 3/06/2008

We're figs we're friut, we're gonna spread our roots.

Teddy Bear Mohammed | 04:47 pm on 3/06/2008

God Hates Shrimp

Shrimp, crab, lobster, clams, mussels, all these are an abomination before the Lord, just as gays are an abomination. Why stop at protesting gay marriage? Bring all of God's law unto the heathens and the sodomites. We call upon all Christians to join the crusade against Long John Silver's and Red Lobster. Yea, even Popeye's shall be cleansed. The name of Bubba shall be anathema. We must stop the unbelievers from destroying the sanctity of our restaurants.

Leviticus 11:9-12 says:
9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Deuteronomy 14:9-10 says:
9 These ye shall eat of all that are in the waters: all that have fins and scales shall ye eat:
10 And whatsoever hath not fins and scales ye may not eat; it is unclean unto you.

http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/

chicklittle | 04:02 pm on 3/11/2008

Good point. You forgot to mention tithing.

pooh | 06:36 pm on 3/06/2008

Oh bother

Little D | 07:15 pm on 3/06/2008

To the first two Anonymous posters (or Doug and Wendy):
Hey, people -- get a life. You had a good time in Dallas. You disagreed. You left. Being the FIRST to post a hateful e-mail with every new article about how much you hate Ole or Olaf or Sven or whoever makes you look lamer than you really are.
Please. Get. A. Life. Plant a garden. Have some more kids. Get a hobby.
But move on ...

mountainguy | 11:01 pm on 3/06/2008

BTW, what do you mean for fig? I know it is a fruit (I don't like its taste too much, but its very interesting in ecologically terms), but I'm not USAmerican (hey, please stop believing you're the only fuckng nation in this lovely and large continent), so I don't really know what do you mean by "Fig".

Anonymous | 01:52 pm on 3/07/2008

Do you think the protestor was dyslexic? Could be fag, cig, fog, fug, gig, n**, pig, wig. i like the idea of protesting against wigs most.
i live in London (the old one), by the way,and even I know plenty of people who'd qualify as american fundamentalists who don't fit into your two categories. but i guess this article isn't trying to make a serious point or it would be, er, possible to take it seriously

Allan | 07:31 pm on 3/07/2008

Is it just me or are the comment sections on this site always at least 50% filled with observations that either a) do not make the slightest lick of rational sense, b) indicate that the commentator is one of those poor sad souls who lacks even the slightest appreciation of humour or irony or c) is clearly the response of someone who only read the smallest possible portion of the article in question before they felt compelled to immediately register their strongly worded protest against their completely oblivious misrepresentation of its actual intended point?

Actually, thinking about it, I just described every comment section on every website that ever existed.

Anyhoo, stuff like this is the main reason this existential agnostic keeps coming back to this site day after day!

Keep up the good work!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.